PySide Shiboken Words of Advice: Difference between revisions
Henri Vikki (talk | contribs) (format) |
AutoSpider (talk | contribs) (Rename category "LanguageBindings::PySide" -> "PySide") |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category | [[Category:PySide]] | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The combination of duck punching, the practice of altering class characteristics of already instantiated objects, and virtual methods of wrapped C++ classes, can be tricky. That was an optimistic statement. | The combination of duck punching, the practice of altering class characteristics of already instantiated objects, and virtual methods of wrapped C++ classes, can be tricky. That was an optimistic statement. | ||
Let's see duck punching in action for educational purposes. | |||
<code> | <code> | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
</code> | </code> | ||
If some C++ code happens to call CppClass::virtualMethod(…) on the C++ object held by | If some C++ code happens to call CppClass::virtualMethod(…) on the C++ object held by "obj" Python object, the new duck punched "virtualMethod" method will be properly called. That happens because the underlying C++ object is in fact an instance of a generated C++ class that inherits from CppClass, let's call it CppClassWrapper, responsible for receiving the C++ virtual method calls and finding out the proper Python override to which handle such a call. | ||
Now that you know this, consider the case when C++ has a factory method that gives you new C++ objects originated somewhere in C+''-land, in opposition to the ones generated in Python-land by the usage of class constructors, like in the example above. | Now that you know this, consider the case when C++ has a factory method that gives you new C++ objects originated somewhere in C+''-land, in opposition to the ones generated in Python-land by the usage of class constructors, like in the example above. | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
The Binding.createCppClass() factory method is just an example, C''+ created objects can pop out for a number of other reasons. Objects created this way have a Python wrapper holding them as usual, but the object held is not a CppClassWrapper, but a regular CppClass. All virtual method calls originated in C++ will stay in C++ and never reach a Python virtual method overridden via duck punching. | The Binding.createCppClass() factory method is just an example, C''+ created objects can pop out for a number of other reasons. Objects created this way have a Python wrapper holding them as usual, but the object held is not a CppClassWrapper, but a regular CppClass. All virtual method calls originated in C++ will stay in C++ and never reach a Python virtual method overridden via duck punching. | ||
Although duck punching is an interesting Python feature, it | Although duck punching is an interesting Python feature, it don't mix well with wrapped C++ virtual methods, specially when you can't tell the origin of every single wrapped C++ object. In summary: don't do it! | ||
== Python old style classes and PySide == | == Python old style classes and PySide == | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
</code> | </code> | ||
this example will raise a | this example will raise a 'TypeError' due to the limitation on PySide, to fix this you will need use the new style class: | ||
<code> | <code> |
Latest revision as of 03:31, 5 June 2016
When writing or using Python bindings there is some things you must keep in mind.
Duck punching and virtual methods
The combination of duck punching, the practice of altering class characteristics of already instantiated objects, and virtual methods of wrapped C++ classes, can be tricky. That was an optimistic statement.
Let's see duck punching in action for educational purposes.
import types
import Binding
obj = Binding.CppClass()
# CppClass has a virtual method called 'virtualMethod',
# but we don't like it anymore.
def myVirtualMethod(self_obj, arg):
pass
obj.virtualMethod = types.MethodType(myVirtualMethod, obj, Binding.CppClass)
If some C++ code happens to call CppClass::virtualMethod(…) on the C++ object held by "obj" Python object, the new duck punched "virtualMethod" method will be properly called. That happens because the underlying C++ object is in fact an instance of a generated C++ class that inherits from CppClass, let's call it CppClassWrapper, responsible for receiving the C++ virtual method calls and finding out the proper Python override to which handle such a call.
Now that you know this, consider the case when C++ has a factory method that gives you new C++ objects originated somewhere in C+-land, in opposition to the ones generated in Python-land by the usage of class constructors, like in the example above.
Brief interruption to show what I was saying:
import types
import Binding
obj = Binding.createCppClass()
def myVirtualMethod(self_obj, arg):
pass
# Punching a dead duck…
obj.virtualMethod = types.MethodType(myVirtualMethod, obj, Binding.CppClass)
The Binding.createCppClass() factory method is just an example, C+ created objects can pop out for a number of other reasons. Objects created this way have a Python wrapper holding them as usual, but the object held is not a CppClassWrapper, but a regular CppClass. All virtual method calls originated in C++ will stay in C++ and never reach a Python virtual method overridden via duck punching.
Although duck punching is an interesting Python feature, it don't mix well with wrapped C++ virtual methods, specially when you can't tell the origin of every single wrapped C++ object. In summary: don't do it!
Python old style classes and PySide
Because of some architectural decisions and deprecated Python types. Since PySide 1.1 old style classes are not supported with multiple inheritance.
Below you can check the examples:
Example with old style class:
from PySide import QtCore
class MyOldStyleObject:
pass
class MyObject(QtCore, MyOldStyleObject):
pass
this example will raise a 'TypeError' due to the limitation on PySide, to fix this you will need use the new style class:
from PySide import QtCore
class MyOldStyleObject(object):
pass
class MyObject(QtCore, MyOldStyleObject):
pass