Qt Network Workshop 2016: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(Merge edit by Peter Ha) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
** The variations in build options, versions etc. between the platforms and distros has got to the point of insanity | ** The variations in build options, versions etc. between the platforms and distros has got to the point of insanity | ||
* OpenSSL 1.1 support | * OpenSSL 1.1 support | ||
* What are the main use cases for QtNetwork: HTTP(S)? Are there new use cases for e.g. IoT (UDP / UPnP etc.)? | |||
* IoT | * IoT | ||
** Identify areas of QtNetwork we should focus on (HTTP(S) / low level sockets) | ** Identify areas of QtNetwork we should focus on (HTTP(S) / low level sockets) | ||
** Are there areas in QtNetwork to support the IoT story? | ** Are there areas in QtNetwork to support the IoT story? | ||
** Is there input from sales or so? | ** Is there input from sales or so? | ||
Revision as of 13:55, 14 July 2016
Proposed Discussion Topics
- Redirection support
- Should it be on by default
- more configurable...
- The test server
- How can we get the image
- How can we add services etc.
- How can we better manage the various openssl builds?
- The variations in build options, versions etc. between the platforms and distros has got to the point of insanity
- OpenSSL 1.1 support
- What are the main use cases for QtNetwork: HTTP(S)? Are there new use cases for e.g. IoT (UDP / UPnP etc.)?
- IoT
- Identify areas of QtNetwork we should focus on (HTTP(S) / low level sockets)
- Are there areas in QtNetwork to support the IoT story?
- Is there input from sales or so?