QtCS2017 QtQuickControlsDeployment

From Qt Wiki
Revision as of 10:10, 9 October 2017 by Kkoehne (talk | contribs) (Created page with "= Meeting minutes from (Qt Quick Controls) Deployment Challenges, QtCon 2017 = Organizer: Nils Jeisecke Notetaker: Kai Koehne * First user experience is bad ** windeployqt d...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Meeting minutes from (Qt Quick Controls) Deployment Challenges, QtCon 2017

Organizer: Nils Jeisecke Notetaker: Kai Koehne

  • First user experience is bad
    • windeployqt does expect qml files in subdirectory
    • Qt Creator template puts main.qml in top level file
  • Files / resources mess
    • Documentation for QQ Controls 1: "Everything is in resources"
    • windeployqt copies a lot of .qml files though
    • Also .qmlc files are copied by windeployqt
      • Comment: All these .qml files are prob a bug in Qt Quick Controls 1 build scripts
      • Comment: We probably copy them for debugging/profiling
  • Difference between static and dynamic builds
    • Static builds: .qml files for imports are put into the executable
    • Dynamic builds: single .qml files are shipped
    • This is not reflected by documentation though
  • Why is Qt resource system better
    • Unified approach on all platforms
    • Code signing
    • .qmlc
  • Same problems are there for Qt Quick Controls 2: QTBUG-48386
  • Why is 'qmltooling' deployed by windeployqt?
    • Useful for debugging and profiling
    • There's no clear distinction though between 'deployment' to a device, and generating a final package.
  • Conclusion
    • We think Qt resource system should be the way to go
    • Anhow, we miss the right people in the session to decide this. Let's try to schedule a second slot.