Comparison of Qt 3D and Qt 3D Studio

From Qt Wiki
Revision as of 14:45, 16 February 2018 by Dragly (talk | contribs) (Created page with "In short, Qt 3D Studio is built on top of Qt 3D. The flexible architecture of Qt 3D makes it suitable to build 3D runtimes, or engines, such as Qt 3D Studio. == Qt 3D == Qt 3...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In short, Qt 3D Studio is built on top of Qt 3D. The flexible architecture of Qt 3D makes it suitable to build 3D runtimes, or engines, such as Qt 3D Studio.

Qt 3D

Qt 3D is programmer-oriented and great for both simple and complex scenes. Qt 3D simplifies the implementation of advanced rendering techniques.

Qt 3D Studio

Qt 3D Studio consists of both a 3D editor and a 3D runtime. Qt 3D Studio is designer-oriented and makes it easy to build complex 3D scenes that can be used in Qt applications.

Use case comparison

Whether you should use Qt 3D or Qt 3D Studio for your project depends on your use case. Below, we list some common use cases and how they apply to the two:

Use case Qt 3D Qt 3D Studio
Drag-and-drop editing of a 3D scene for use in a Qt application No built-in tool. Can import common 3D formats from external editors. Yes, use the Qt 3D Studio Editor
Creating a simple multi-pass rendering pipeline Suitable Suitable
Using custom shaders Suitable Suitable
Layer-based compositing Suitable Suitable
Creating a graphical 3D editor Suitable Not possible
Creating an advanced rendering pipeline with custom rendering techniques such as volumetric rendering Suitable Not suitable
Creating a custom 3D engine Suitable Not possible