Qt Webkit HTML5 Score
| This article may require cleanup to meet the Qt Wiki's quality standards. Reason: Auto-imported from ExpressionEngine. Please improve this article if you can. Remove the {{cleanup}} tag and add this page to Updated pages list after it's clean. |
[toc align_right="yes" depth="2"]
———— to be formatted
==== This is just to track support of Qt Webkit for HTML5. These are the ratings generating using html5test and on Qt Webkit 2.0.x ====
SCORE out of 400
Total Score is 212 And Bonus Points: 2
Parsing rules
Score: 1/11
<!DOCTYPE html> triggers standards mode Yes ✔ HTML5 tokenizer No ✘ HTML5 tree building No ✘ HTML5 defines rules for embedding SVG and MathML inside a regular HTML document. Support for SVG and MathML is not required though, so bonus points are awarded if your browser supports embedding these two technologies. SVG in text/html No ✘ MathML in text/html No ✘
Canvas
Score: 20/20
canvas element Yes ✔ 2D context Yes ✔ Text Yes ✔
Video
Score: 21/31
video element Yes ✔ Subtitle support No ✘ Poster image support Yes ✔ The following tests go beyond the requirements of the HTML5 specification and are not counted towards the total score. If a browser supports one or more video codecs, two bonus points are awarded for each codec. MPEG-4 support No ✘ H.264 support No ✘ Ogg Theora support No ✘ WebM support No ✘
Audio
Score: 2 bonus points: 20
audio element Yes ✔ The following tests go beyond the requirements of the HTML5 specification and are not counted towards the total score. If a browser supports one or more audio codecs, one bonus point is awarded for each codec. PCM audio support Yes ✔ MP3 support Yes ✔ AAC support No ✘ Ogg Vorbis support No ✘ WebM support No ✘
Elements
Score: 24/38
Embedding custom non-visible data No ✘ New or modified elements Section elements Yes ✔ Grouping content elements No ✘ Text-level semantic elements Partial ○ Interactive elements Partial ○ Global attributes or methods hidden attribute No ✘ contenteditable attribute Yes ✔ Dynamic markup insertion Yes ✔
Forms
Score: 31/90
Field types input type=search Yes ✔ input type=tel Yes ✔ input type=url Yes ✔ input type=email Yes ✔ input type=datetime Partial ○ input type=date Partial ○ input type=month Partial ○ input type=week Partial ○ input type=time Partial ○ input type=datetime-local Partial ○ input type=number Partial ○ input type=range Yes ✔ input type=color Partial ○ input type=checkbox Yes ✔ select No ✘ fieldset No ✘ datalist Partial ○ keygen Partial ○ output No ✘ progress No ✘ meter No ✘
Fields
Field validation Yes ✔ Association of controls and forms Partial ○ Other attributes Partial ○ CSS selectors Partial ○ Events Yes ✔
Forms
Form validation Yes ✔ Events No ✘
User interaction
Score: 15/15
Drag and drop Yes ✔ Session history Yes ✔
Microdata
Score: 0/15
Microdata No ✘
Web applications
Score: 19
Application Cache Yes ✔ Custom scheme handlers Yes ✔ Custom content handlers Yes ✔
Security
Score: 5/10
Sandboxed iframe Yes ✔ Seamless iframe No ✘
Related specifications
Geolocation
Score: 0/15
Geolocation No ✘
WebGL
Score: 0/15
3D context No ✘
Communication
Score: 25/25
Cross-document messaging Yes ✔ Server-Sent Events Yes ✔ Both Mozilla and Opera do support the WebSocket protocol in their latest browsers, but have disabled it due to a fundamental security issue with the protocol. Once the protocol has been updated it is expected they will re-enable this feature. WebSocket Yes ✔
Files
Score: 0/20
FileReader API No ✘ FileWriter API No ✘
Storage
Score: 15/20
Session Storage Yes ✔ Local Storage Yes ✔ IndexedDB No ✘ The Web SQL Database specification is no longer being updated and has been replaced by IndexedDB. Because at least 3 vendors have shipped implementations of this specification we still include it in this test. Web SQL Database Yes ✔
Workers
Score: 10/10
Web Workers Yes ✔
Local devices
Score: 0/20
device element No ✘
Other
Score: 6/6
Text selection Yes ✔ Scroll into view Yes ✔