Qt Contributors Summit 2019 - moc and QMetaObject

• breaking ABI allows for performance changes and additional features in QMetaObject
• what about newer C++ features
  • raw literals are an issue e.g. like in tests
    • worse, error handling is confusing and makes it hard for users to know what's going on
  • can we use libclang instead of workarounds? see moc-ng
    • libclang can be quite slow, but we already did it for lupdate and qdoc
    • roughly an order of magnitude slower, but we could do better?
    • when using build farms, moc is a bottleneck - unless it could be distributed but that doesn't sound feasible
    • bootstrapping is quasi impossible when using libclang, we'd have to port moc to not use C++ anymore
    • size of libclang + dependencies is only an issue for developer machines, roughly ~80mb
  • why can't we use something easier than libclang?
    • parsing C++ is actually very hard with some C++ changes recently
    • we only need to parse a few things correctly, but we have to ignore all of the rest properly, which is tough
  • for qt6 we could remove old system to use moc without passing include paths, i.e. hard error if file is missing
• when we need to extend moc, do we extend the old one or do we build a new tool based on top of libclang and add the new features there?