QtCS2021 - Documentation test builds in the CI system: Difference between revisions

From Qt Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


==Notes==
==Notes==
* Quick presentation by Topi and Paul.
* Per repo only, warnings for cross-linking references will be disregarded for technical reasons.
* One Ubuntu configuration only, as that's where release docs are built.
* Per module control, meaning modules can be excluded in special cases.


=== Discussion ===
=== Discussion ===
 
* Enforcing no warnings would be good; potential problem: introducing new C++ standard features where QDoc struggles, for examples (e.g. when C++17 was introduces with Qt 6). What happens when C++20 shows up in Qt?
*
** Possibly port QDoc from C-based clang API to C++-based API
** Intention is to support development,
* Effort needed from doc team and CI team? CI system?
** Patches in Gerrit are in good shape, might need some further support from the CI team.
** Integration times extended by the doc build time required for each repo. E.g. qtbase adds maybe as much as 10 minutes (best guess).
** Might run in parallel and not add integration time at all.
* Should doc builds run early to fail integrations early?
** Play around with alternatives to provide quick feedback.

Revision as of 11:32, 23 June 2021


Session Summary

Every release of Qt brings with it a lot of "fire fighting" in terms of getting rid of QDoc's warnings across all modules. We propose to block changes that introduce QDoc warnings in CI. This is a session to discuss the proposed solution to the problem.

Session Owners

  • Paul Wicking / Topi Reiniö (documentation.infrastructure@qt.io)

Notes

  • Quick presentation by Topi and Paul.
  • Per repo only, warnings for cross-linking references will be disregarded for technical reasons.
  • One Ubuntu configuration only, as that's where release docs are built.
  • Per module control, meaning modules can be excluded in special cases.

Discussion

  • Enforcing no warnings would be good; potential problem: introducing new C++ standard features where QDoc struggles, for examples (e.g. when C++17 was introduces with Qt 6). What happens when C++20 shows up in Qt?
    • Possibly port QDoc from C-based clang API to C++-based API
    • Intention is to support development,
  • Effort needed from doc team and CI team? CI system?
    • Patches in Gerrit are in good shape, might need some further support from the CI team.
    • Integration times extended by the doc build time required for each repo. E.g. qtbase adds maybe as much as 10 minutes (best guess).
    • Might run in parallel and not add integration time at all.
  • Should doc builds run early to fail integrations early?
    • Play around with alternatives to provide quick feedback.