Talk:Main: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:11, 16 June 2017

there is a error information "No marker found, stopped after 1.00 MiB" when i make ./Qt_5.6_XX.run

Hi, please post questions at the forum (http://forum.qt.io/). A Wiki talk page is for discussing what to write in the Wiki article. --JKSH (talk) 00:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Qt 5.6 is a supported LTS release. I think it deserves to be on the main page, especially if 4.8 is there.

Qt 5.9 is the current LTS release replacing Qt 5.6.
- Qt 5.9 doesn't replace Qt 5.6. It is still supported. 5.6.3, and if the 3 year support promise is kept, also 5.6.4 and hopefully 5.6.5 will be released. So it needs to be in that table if Qt 4.8.7 is there and as long as there are releases to be made for 5.6. Just keeping 4.8 and 5.9 makes it like there is no other choice for users. This is a disservice to your users. Actually you shouldn't recommend 5.9 so eagerly, at least not until 5.9.2 is released, i.e. not until many regressions and P1 issues are resolved. Until that time, 5.6 remains a good recommendation for conservative users.

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 Qt 5.6 is a supported LTS release. I think it deserves to be on the main page, especially if 4.8 is there.
 * Qt 5.9 is the current LTS release replacing Qt 5.6.
+** Qt 5.9 doesn't replace Qt 5.6. It is still supported. 5.6.3, and if the 3 year support promise is kept, also 5.6.4 and hopefully 5.6.5 will be released. So it needs to be in that table if Qt 4.8.7 is there and as long as there are releases to be made for 5.6. Just keeping 4.8 and 5.9 makes it like there is no other choice for users. This is a disservice to your users. Actually you shouldn't recommend 5.9 so eagerly, at least not until 5.9.2 is released, i.e. not  until many regressions and P1 issues are resolved. Until that time, 5.6 remains a good recommendation for conservative users.