Wiki Week: Difference between revisions

From Qt Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Suggestions: Add some responses)
(Added info for Wiki Week 2016)
Line 1: Line 1:
==The First Wiki Week is now 18-22.5.2015==
==The Next Wiki Week is 21-25.3.2016==
* See the [http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/03/07/wiki-week-coming-up-in-two-weeks/ blog post] announcement.
* Coordination and discussion take place on this page and on the [http://forum.qt.io/category/16/wiki-discussion forum].
 
==The First Wiki Week was 18-22.5.2015==
See the [http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/05/05/announcing-wiki-week/ blog post] announcement.
See the [http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/05/05/announcing-wiki-week/ blog post] announcement.



Revision as of 19:00, 10 March 2016

The Next Wiki Week is 21-25.3.2016

  • See the blog post announcement.
  • Coordination and discussion take place on this page and on the forum.

The First Wiki Week was 18-22.5.2015

See the blog post announcement.

Things to do

During wiki week we will work together on these topics:

This page will contain links to lists of pages that need to be checked or fixed.

Reminder: Code Formatting

A guideline to people writing code examples on the wiki.

For example .pro files need to have

 <code lang="make">

defined in their code block.

Suggestions

Localization improvement: Dedicated wiki for each language

The organization of articles in languages others then English is pretty bad. I suggest to do it like Wikipedia and have subdomains with dedicated mediawikis for all supported languages and create links between articles in different language versions. I've put together a somewhat lengthy explanation of what is going wrong with the current localization scheme and why I think this is the way to go to achieve the best user experience; it can be found on the forum: [1] --Wieland (talk) 20:30, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Removing pages

Symbian is dead. Shall we remove Symbian related pages? I would say yes. But what about Qt3? There is at least one project I know (the unholy KDE3 fork Trinity) that still uses Qt3, although they are "maintaining" their own Qt3 fork. Shall Qt3 related pages be removed, too? Shall we send an e-mail to the Trinity guy(s)? --Wieland (talk) 23:28, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

I vote for archiving, not deletion. --JKSH (talk) 14:44, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Clear distinction between Qt versions

I think there should be a clear, big fat warning on top of every article that specifically targets Qt4. --Wieland (talk) 23:29, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Agreed. Use Template:Outdated. --JKSH (talk) 14:44, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

List of needed articles

Some questions pop up on the forums again and again. I think it would be of great value if we could identify those questions and make a list of articles that need to be written. --Wieland (talk) 23:43, 15 May 2015 (UTC)