Qt Creator ManualTests DebuggerCdb: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Removed "edit string" test , see QTCREATORBUG-28783) |
(Clarify what the comments in simple.pro are for) |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Step through some (not all) test* functions and check whether the displayed data looks | | Step through some (not all) test* functions and check whether the displayed data looks correct | ||
| | | | ||
| The code contains comments with the expected displayed data. These are meant for semi-automatic runs and might differ from what you see. Use your own judgement what's correct and what's not. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Comment out the return statement inside the following functions one by one. Check whether you'll end up with a proper stack trace & locals display. | | Comment out the return statement inside the following functions one by one. Check whether you'll end up with a proper stack trace & locals display. |
Latest revision as of 10:47, 30 June 2023
For the following tests, you will need to build projects on Qt using MSVC and debug them using cdb. You can get a suitable build of Qt from the official Online Installer.
Test | Result | Annotation |
---|---|---|
Create new project. Can you build, run and debug it? | automated | |
Set breakpoint, press F5 to build and run debugger, verify that program stops at a breakpoint that you set:
|
||
Test breakpoint module resolution (see below) | ||
"Step into" a couple of times. Can you step into Qt source code (*.cpp file under QTDIR. You might need to configure source paths mapping under "Edit" -> "Preferences…" -> "Debugger" -> "General" -> "Add Qt sources...")? | ||
Test debugging helpers: Do classes like QImage or std::string show beautiful information instead of the raw structure? | automated | |
Step through some (not all) test* functions and check whether the displayed data looks correct | The code contains comments with the expected displayed data. These are meant for semi-automatic runs and might differ from what you see. Use your own judgement what's correct and what's not. | |
Comment out the return statement inside the following functions one by one. Check whether you'll end up with a proper stack trace & locals display.
|
||
Test a breakpoint in a QThread:
|
||
Switch on temporarily 'Operate by Instruction' (small icon above the stack trace) and check whether you see disassembler output and can step by instruction |
Test | Result | Annotation |
---|---|---|
Check I/O (qDebug, std::cout, std::cerr), on Win for both Debug and Release. Please read the below note! | ||
Check "Run in Terminal". Use Terminal for input. | ||
Check nothing bad happens on a simple int main() {} program with no breakpoints set | automated |
Test | Result | Annotation |
---|---|---|
Check registering for post-mortem debugging:
|
||
Attach to a crashed process | ||
|
||
Test unusual situations: Kill X 'externally' while debugging (both in a 'running' and 'stopped' state), where X is
|
Breakpoint module resolution
- Set a new breakpoint in application code (say 'testapp').
- Right-click into the breakpoint view and make sure that "Use Tooltips (...)" is checked.
- Hover over breakpoint view, verify that 'Module' is empty in tooltip.
- Start the application, make it stop at breakpoint.
- Finish debugging, restart debugger. Should be faster now.
- Display tooltip of breakpoint again. Module should now be something 'testapp'.
stderr/stdout handling on Windows
- An application needs to be built with 'console' for stderr/stdout to appear (use Creator's "Run in terminal" setting)
- Creator itself is built with 'console' in debug mode only.
- qDebug() prints to stderr for 'console' apps, else to the Windows debugger log, which can be shown with the DbgView utility
- CDB will catch only qDebug() when app is built without ‘console’, rest goes to app console as with normal Windows app