Qt-contributors-summit-2011-Qt and OAuth: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Summary from our session at the Qt Contributor Summit 2011 (see http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-6229):= | |||
* “I know the pain of OAuth, I’m looking forward to have it in Qt” | |||
* “We are missing OAuth” | |||
* Please vote for this bug | |||
* OAuth1 vs OAuth2. We think OAuth1 is not that important anymore | |||
* Let’s not tie this to Qt5 | |||
* There is kQAuth, <span class="caps">QOA</span>uth, Digia-OAuth, Futurize-OAuth, article about OAuth2 using <span class="caps">QML</span> | |||
* Maybe QtAddon that everyone can use, maybe with a checkbox inside the <span class="caps">SDK</span> | |||
* <span class="caps">HMAC</span>-SHA1 needed, might introduce OpenSSL dependency | |||
* Outcome: Follow up with Johan Paul, Follow up with ? about Qt addons/modules. | |||
Revision as of 14:02, 25 February 2015
Summary from our session at the Qt Contributor Summit 2011 (see http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-6229):
- “I know the pain of OAuth, I’m looking forward to have it in Qt”
- “We are missing OAuth”
- Please vote for this bug
- OAuth1 vs OAuth2. We think OAuth1 is not that important anymore
- Let’s not tie this to Qt5
- There is kQAuth, QOAuth, Digia-OAuth, Futurize-OAuth, article about OAuth2 using QML
- Maybe QtAddon that everyone can use, maybe with a checkbox inside the SDK
- HMAC-SHA1 needed, might introduce OpenSSL dependency
- Outcome: Follow up with Johan Paul, Follow up with ? about Qt addons/modules.