QtCS2015 Website: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 15:15, 11 June 2015

Current state of services
Users were not lost in the qt.io migration
Public bugs and support bugs, it is not optimal to have two bug types
Qt Account and what is the benefit in it
- Provides the single login to most end user facing services
- Will get more benefits in the future
Docnotes are missed
- They are in storage, but need a sensible way to bring them back

Qt Account for bugreports (this isn't so simple, as bugreports uses the username as master and Qt Account has email as master)
Restoring docnotes

Revision as of 11:16, 11 June 2015 (view source) Tekojo (talk \| contribs) (Created page with "==Topics of discussion== * Current state of services * Users were not lost in the qt.io migration * Public bugs and support bugs, it is not optimal to have two bug types * Qt...")		Latest revision as of 15:15, 11 June 2015 (view source) NetZwerg (talk \| contribs) m (Added Category)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			[[Category:QtCS2015]]
	==Topics of discussion==		==Topics of discussion==