Wiki Week: Difference between revisions
(→Suggestions: Add some responses) |
(Added info for Wiki Week 2016) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==The First Wiki Week | ==The Next Wiki Week is 21-25.3.2016== | ||
* See the [http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/03/07/wiki-week-coming-up-in-two-weeks/ blog post] announcement. | |||
* Coordination and discussion take place on this page and on the [http://forum.qt.io/category/16/wiki-discussion forum]. | |||
==The First Wiki Week was 18-22.5.2015== | |||
See the [http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/05/05/announcing-wiki-week/ blog post] announcement. | See the [http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/05/05/announcing-wiki-week/ blog post] announcement. | ||
Revision as of 19:00, 10 March 2016
The Next Wiki Week is 21-25.3.2016
- See the blog post announcement.
- Coordination and discussion take place on this page and on the forum.
The First Wiki Week was 18-22.5.2015
See the blog post announcement.
Things to do
During wiki week we will work together on these topics:
- Cleaning up Wiki week active page list
- Marking old pages as needing updates
- Review pages that contain larger issues: Category:WW issues
This page will contain links to lists of pages that need to be checked or fixed.
Reminder: Code Formatting
A guideline to people writing code examples on the wiki.
For example .pro files need to have
<code lang="make">
defined in their code block.
Suggestions
Localization improvement: Dedicated wiki for each language
The organization of articles in languages others then English is pretty bad. I suggest to do it like Wikipedia and have subdomains with dedicated mediawikis for all supported languages and create links between articles in different language versions. I've put together a somewhat lengthy explanation of what is going wrong with the current localization scheme and why I think this is the way to go to achieve the best user experience; it can be found on the forum: [1] --Wieland (talk) 20:30, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Removing pages
Symbian is dead. Shall we remove Symbian related pages? I would say yes. But what about Qt3? There is at least one project I know (the unholy KDE3 fork Trinity) that still uses Qt3, although they are "maintaining" their own Qt3 fork. Shall Qt3 related pages be removed, too? Shall we send an e-mail to the Trinity guy(s)? --Wieland (talk) 23:28, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Clear distinction between Qt versions
I think there should be a clear, big fat warning on top of every article that specifically targets Qt4. --Wieland (talk) 23:29, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- Agreed. Use Template:Outdated. --JKSH (talk) 14:44, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
List of needed articles
Some questions pop up on the forums again and again. I think it would be of great value if we could identify those questions and make a list of articles that need to be written. --Wieland (talk) 23:43, 15 May 2015 (UTC)