QtCS2017 WikiMaintenance: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(category) |
(Notes) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:QtCS2017]] | |||
Session notes for wiki.qt.io session at [[Qt contributors summit 2017 Program|Qt Contributors' Summit 2017]]. | Session notes for wiki.qt.io session at [[Qt contributors summit 2017 Program|Qt Contributors' Summit 2017]]. | ||
| Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
* Tagging and categories | * Tagging and categories | ||
* ?? | * ?? | ||
== Current situation: == | |||
* First page is nice | |||
* Release team does a good job with their pages | |||
* User content tends to rot and needs cleanup | |||
* User content looks like official post so their might be confusion like platform officially supported MinGW VS MinGW64 | |||
* Spam onslaught happened and there's need for more control is needed | |||
* Moderation plugin is active | |||
* Working through all the documents would take at least a year | |||
== Possible actions == | |||
* Improve edit queues (more people in it) | |||
* Have maintainers to do quick reviews | |||
* Tag pages for knowingly be old/outdated (maybe after six months) | |||
* Somehow mark officially edit pages (e.g. Qt Release Team) VS user edit content | |||
* Enable only english ? Most of the other languages might not be reviewable | |||
== Things that we can do == | |||
* Setup a mailing list for maintainers | |||
Latest revision as of 12:00, 9 October 2017
Session notes for wiki.qt.io session at Qt Contributors' Summit 2017.
Topics:
- Changes needed
- Moderation
- Tagging and categories
- ??
Current situation:
- First page is nice
- Release team does a good job with their pages
- User content tends to rot and needs cleanup
- User content looks like official post so their might be confusion like platform officially supported MinGW VS MinGW64
- Spam onslaught happened and there's need for more control is needed
- Moderation plugin is active
- Working through all the documents would take at least a year
Possible actions
- Improve edit queues (more people in it)
- Have maintainers to do quick reviews
- Tag pages for knowingly be old/outdated (maybe after six months)
- Somehow mark officially edit pages (e.g. Qt Release Team) VS user edit content
- Enable only english ? Most of the other languages might not be reviewable
Things that we can do
- Setup a mailing list for maintainers