QtCS2017 WikiMaintenance: Difference between revisions

From Qt Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created notes page)
 
(Notes)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Session notes for wiki.qt.io session at [[Qt Contributors Summit 2017 program|Qt Contributors' Summit 2017]].
[[Category:QtCS2017]]
 
Session notes for wiki.qt.io session at [[Qt contributors summit 2017 Program|Qt Contributors' Summit 2017]].
 
Topics:
* Changes needed
* Moderation
* Tagging and categories
* ??
 
== Current situation: ==
* First page is nice
* Release team does a good job with their pages
* User content tends to rot and needs cleanup
* User content looks like official post so their might be confusion like platform officially supported MinGW VS MinGW64
* Spam onslaught happened and there's need for more control is needed
* Moderation plugin is active
* Working through all the documents would take at least a year
 
== Possible actions ==
* Improve edit queues (more people in it)
* Have maintainers to do quick reviews
* Tag pages for knowingly be old/outdated (maybe after six months)
* Somehow mark officially edit pages (e.g. Qt Release Team) VS user edit content
* Enable only english ? Most of the other languages might not be reviewable
 
== Things that we can do ==
* Setup a mailing list for maintainers

Latest revision as of 12:00, 9 October 2017


Session notes for wiki.qt.io session at Qt Contributors' Summit 2017.

Topics:

  • Changes needed
  • Moderation
  • Tagging and categories
  • ??

Current situation:

  • First page is nice
  • Release team does a good job with their pages
  • User content tends to rot and needs cleanup
  • User content looks like official post so their might be confusion like platform officially supported MinGW VS MinGW64
  • Spam onslaught happened and there's need for more control is needed
  • Moderation plugin is active
  • Working through all the documents would take at least a year

Possible actions

  • Improve edit queues (more people in it)
  • Have maintainers to do quick reviews
  • Tag pages for knowingly be old/outdated (maybe after six months)
  • Somehow mark officially edit pages (e.g. Qt Release Team) VS user edit content
  • Enable only english ? Most of the other languages might not be reviewable

Things that we can do

  • Setup a mailing list for maintainers