Wiki Week: Difference between revisions

From Qt Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(List of needed articles)
Line 22: Line 22:
== Clear distinction between Qt versions ==
== Clear distinction between Qt versions ==
I think there should be a clear, big fat warning on top of every article that specifically targets Qt4. --[[User:Wieland|Wieland]] ([[User talk:Wieland|talk]]) 23:29, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
I think there should be a clear, big fat warning on top of every article that specifically targets Qt4. --[[User:Wieland|Wieland]] ([[User talk:Wieland|talk]]) 23:29, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
== List of needed articles ==
Some questions pop up on the forums again and again. I think it would be of great value if we could identify those questions and make a list of articles that need to be written. --[[User:Wieland|Wieland]] ([[User talk:Wieland|talk]]) 23:43, 15 May 2015 (UTC)


[[Category:Wiki week]]
[[Category:Wiki week]]

Revision as of 23:43, 15 May 2015

The First Wiki Week will be held on 18-22.5.2015

See the blog post announcement.

Things to do

During wiki week we will work together on these topics:

This page will contain links to lists of pages that need to be checked or fixed.

Suggestion: Localization improvement: Dedicated wiki for each language

The organization of articles in languages others then English is pretty bad. I suggest to do it like Wikipedia and have subdomains with dedicated mediawikis for all supported languages and create links between articles in different language versions. I've put together a somewhat lengthy explanation of what is going wrong with the current localization scheme and why I think this is the way to go to achieve the best user experience; it can be found on the forum: [1] --Wieland (talk) 20:30, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Removing pages

Symbian is dead. Shall we remove Symbian related pages? I would say yes. But what about Qt3? There is at least one project I know (the unholy KDE3 fork Trinity) that still uses Qt3, although they are "maintaining" their own Qt3 fork. Shall Qt3 related pages be removed, too? Shall we send an e-mail to the Trinity guy(s)? --Wieland (talk) 23:28, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Clear distinction between Qt versions

I think there should be a clear, big fat warning on top of every article that specifically targets Qt4. --Wieland (talk) 23:29, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

List of needed articles

Some questions pop up on the forums again and again. I think it would be of great value if we could identify those questions and make a list of articles that need to be written. --Wieland (talk) 23:43, 15 May 2015 (UTC)